Accuracy of ultrasound to detect thrombosis in pregnancy: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE:: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound to detect deep--vein thrombosis in pregnant patients. METHOD:: We searched Pubmed, LILACS, Scopus, Google Scholar and System for Information on Grey Literature from inception to April 2016. The reference lists of the included studies were analyzed. Original articles from accuracy studies that analyzed ultrasonography to diagnose deep-vein thrombosis in pregnant women were included. Reference standard was the follow-up time. The QUADAS-2 score was used for quality assessment. RESULTS:: Titles and summaries from 2,129 articles were identified. Four studies that evaluated deep-vein thrombosis in pregnant women were included. In all, 486 participants were enrolled. High risk of bias was seen in three out of four studies included regarding flow and timing domain of QUADAS-2. Negative predictive value was 99.39%. CONCLUSION:: Accuracy of ultrasonography to diagnose deep-vein thrombosis in pregnant women was not determined due to the absence of data yielding positive results. Further studies of low risk of bias are needed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in this clinical scenario.

Accuracy of ultrasound to detect thrombosis in pregnancy: A systematic review / Acurácia da ultrassonografia para detectar trombose na gravidez: uma revisão sistemática

Summary Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound to detect deep--vein thrombosis in pregnant patients. Method: We searched Pubmed, LILACS, Scopus, Google Scholar and System for Information on Grey Literature from inception to April 2016. The reference lists of the included studies were analyzed. Original articles from accuracy studies that analyzed ultrasonography to diagnose deep-vein thrombosis in pregnant women were included. Reference standard was the follow-up time. The QUADAS-2 score was used for quality assessment. Results: Titles and summaries from 2,129 articles were identified. Four studies that evaluated deep-vein thrombosis in pregnant women were included. In all, 486 participants were enrolled. High risk of bias was seen in three out of four studies included regarding flow and timing domain of QUADAS-2. Negative predictive value was 99.39%. Conclusion: Accuracy of ultrasonography to diagnose deep-vein thrombosis in pregnant women was not determined due to the absence of data yielding positive results. Further studies of low risk of bias are needed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in this clinical scenario.

Resumo Objetivo: Determinar a acurácia diagnóstica da ultrassonografia para detectar trombose venosa profunda (TVP) em pacientes grávidas. Método: Pubmed, Lilacs, Scopus, Google Acadêmico e System for Information on Grey Literature foram pesquisados do início até abril de 2016. As referências dos estudos incluídos foram avaliadas. Artigos originais de estudos de acurácia que analisaram ultrassonografia para diagnosticar trombose venosa profunda em mulheres grávidas foram incluídos. O teste de referência foi o tempo de seguimento. O escore de QUADAS-2 foi usado para avaliar a qualidade. Resultados: Títulos e resumos de 2.129 artigos foram identificados. Quatro estudos que avaliaram trombose venosa profunda em grávidas foram incluídos. No total, 486 participantes foram selecionadas. Alto risco de viés foi visto em três dos quatro estudos incluídos considerando o domínio fluxo e tempo do QUADAS-2. O valor preditivo negativo foi 99,39%. Conclusão: A acurácia da ultrassonografia para diagnosticar trombose venosa profunda em mulheres grávidas não pôde ser determinada em razão da ausência de dados de resultados positivos. Estudos com baixo risco de viés são necessários para determinar a acurácia diagnóstica da ultrassonografia nesse cenário clínico.

Is there any benefit in associating neuraxial anesthesia to general anesthesia for coronary artery bypass graft surgery? / Existe algum benefício em associar a anestesia neuroaxial à anestesia geral para revascularização miocárdica?

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The use of neuraxial anesthesia in cardiac surgery is recent, but the hemodynamic effects of local anesthetics and anticoagulation can result in risk to patients. OBJECTIVE: To review the benefits of neuraxial anesthesia in cardiac surgery for CABG through a systematic review of systematic reviews. CONTENT: The search was performed in Pubmed (January 1966 to December 2012), Embase (1974 to December 2012), The Cochrane Library (volume 10, 2012) and Lilacs (1982 to December 2012) databases, in search of articles of systematic reviews. The following variables: mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, in-hospital length of stay, arrhythmias and epidural hematoma were analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: The use of neuraxial anesthesia in cardiac surgery remains controversial. The greatest benefit found by this review was the possibility of reducing postoperative arrhythmias, but this result was contradictory among the identified findings. The results of findings regarding mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke and in-hospital length of stay did not show greater efficacy of neuraxial anesthesia.

RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: O uso da anestesia neuroaxial em cirurgia cardíaca é recente, porém os efeitos hemodinâmicos dos anestésicos locais e a anticoagulação podem trazer riscos aos pacientes. OBJETIVO: Revisar os benefícios da anestesia neuroaxial em cirurgia cardíaca para revascularização miocárdica por meio de uma revisão sistemática de revisões sistemáticas. CONTEÚDO: Foi feita pesquisa nas bases de dados Pubmed (de janeiro de 1966 a dezembro de 2012), Embase (1974 a dezembro 2012), The Cochrane Library (volume 10, 2012) e Lilacs (1982 a dezembro de 2012) em busca de artigos de revisões sistemáticas. Foram analisadas as seguintes variáveis: mortalidade, infarto do miocárdio, acidente vascular cerebral, tempo de internação hospitalar, arritmias e hematoma peridural. CONCLUSÕES: O uso da anestesia neuroaxial para revascularização miocárdica permanece controverso. O maior benefício encontrado por meio desta revisão foi a possibilidade de redução das arritmias pós-operatórias, porém esse resultado foi contraditório entre as evidências identificadas. Os resultados das evidências encontradas referentes à mortalidade, ao infarto do miocárdio, ao acidente vascular cerebral e ao tempo de internação hospitalar não mostraram maior efetividade da anestesia neuroaxial.

Experimental Model of Saccular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Swines with Pericardium Sac.

OBJECTIVE: To consider modifications in an experimental model of saccular aortic aneurysm, aiming at better reproducibility, to be used in the development of vascular prostheses. METHODS: Experimental study in two phases, developed in the Center of Experimental Surgery and Bioterium (CCEB) of the University of Health Sciences of Alagoas (UNCISAL), with 11 hybrid swine, female, mean weight of 20 ± 5 kg, according to modifications in the Perini technique was performed. In the first phase, the aneurysm was confectioned with bovine pericardial patch. In the second phase, fifteen days later, the patency of the aneurysms was confirmed by Doppler ultrasonography. The described variables were aortic and aneurysm sac patency, incidence of rupture, morbidity and mortality. The statistical analysis program used was STATA v.8. RESULTS: All animals survived to the procedures. Surgical mean time was 73 minutes. Aneurysm rupture, proximal or distal aortic thrombosis, visceral or legs ischemia weren't observed. Parietal thrombus formation was observed in all of the aneurysms, two of which (18%; IC 95% = 3.98 - 48.84) were occluded and nine (82%; IC 95% = 51.15 - 96.01) were patent. CONCLUSION: In this series, the modifications carried out in the technique related to the surgical approach, race, anesthesia, and imaging exams reproduced the experimental model, reducing its costs, without hindering the analysis of the variables. The satisfactory patency ratio allows the method to be used in experimental models for the development of vascular prostheses.

Iliac artery myointimal hyperplasia in rabbits submitted to angioplasty and treated with Moringa oleifera.

OBJECTIVE: to assess post-angioplasty myointimal hyperplasia in iliac artery of rabbits treated with extract of Moringa oleifera leaves. METHODS: we conducted a randomized trial in laboratory animals for five weeks of follow-up, developed in the Vivarium of Pharmaceutical Technology Laboratory of the Universidade Federal da Paraíba. We used rabbits from the New Zealand breed, subjected to a hypercholesterolemic diet and angioplasty of the external iliac artery, randomized into two groups: M200 Group (n=10) - rabbits treated with 200mg/kg/day of Moringa oleifera leaves extract orally; SF group (n=10) - rabbits treated with 0.9% saline orally. After five weeks, the animals were euthanized and the iliac arteries prepared for histology. Histological sections were analyzed by digital morphometry. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's t test. The significance level was 0.05. RESULTS: there was no significant difference in myointimal hyperplasia between M200 and SF groups when comparing the iliac arteries submitted to angioplasty. CONCLUSION: there was no difference of myointimal hyperplasia between groups treated with saline and Moringa oleifera after angioplasty.

Is there any benefit in associating neuraxial anesthesia to general anesthesia for coronary artery bypass graft surgery?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The use of neuraxial anesthesia in cardiac surgery is recent, but the hemodynamic effects of local anesthetics and anticoagulation can result in risk to patients. OBJECTIVE: To review the benefits of neuraxial anesthesia in cardiac surgery for CABG through a systematic review of systematic reviews. CONTENT: The search was performed in Pubmed (January 1966 to December 2012), Embase (1974 to December 2012), The Cochrane Library (volume 10, 2012) and Lilacs (1982 to December 2012) databases, in search of articles of systematic reviews. The following variables: mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, in-hospital length of stay, arrhythmias and epidural hematoma were analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: The use of neuraxial anesthesia in cardiac surgery remains controversial. The greatest benefit found by this review was the possibility of reducing postoperative arrhythmias, but this result was contradictory among the identified findings. The results of findings regarding mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke and in-hospital length of stay did not show greater efficacy of neuraxial anesthesia.

Experimental Model of Saccular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Swines with Pericardium Sac

Abstract Objective: To consider modifications in an experimental model of saccular aortic aneurysm, aiming at better reproducibility, to be used in the development of vascular prostheses. Methods: Experimental study in two phases, developed in the Center of Experimental Surgery and Bioterium (CCEB) of the University of Health Sciences of Alagoas (UNCISAL), with 11 hybrid swine, female, mean weight of 20 ± 5 kg, according to modifications in the Perini technique was performed. In the first phase, the aneurysm was confectioned with bovine pericardial patch. In the second phase, fifteen days later, the patency of the aneurysms was confirmed by Doppler ultrasonography. The described variables were aortic and aneurysm sac patency, incidence of rupture, morbidity and mortality. The statistical analysis program used was STATA v.8. Results: All animals survived to the procedures. Surgical mean time was 73 minutes. Aneurysm rupture, proximal or distal aortic thrombosis, visceral or legs ischemia weren't observed. Parietal thrombus formation was observed in all of the aneurysms, two of which (18%; IC 95% = 3.98 - 48.84) were occluded and nine (82%; IC 95% = 51.15 - 96.01) were patent. Conclusion: In this series, the modifications carried out in the technique related to the surgical approach, race, anesthesia, and imaging exams reproduced the experimental model, reducing its costs, without hindering the analysis of the variables. The satisfactory patency ratio allows the method to be used in experimental models for the development of vascular prostheses.

Iliac artery myointimal hyperplasia in rabbits submitted to angioplasty and treated with Moringa oleifera / Hiperplasia miointimal na artéria ilíaca em coelhos submetidos à angioplastia e tratados com Moringa oleifera

Objective: to assess post-angioplasty myointimal hyperplasia in iliac artery of rabbits treated with extract of Moringa oleifera leaves. Methods : we conducted a randomized trial in laboratory animals for five weeks of follow-up, developed in the Vivarium of Pharmaceutical Technology Laboratory of the Universidade Federal da Paraíba. We used rabbits from the New Zealand breed, subjected to a hypercholesterolemic diet and angioplasty of the external iliac artery, randomized into two groups: M200 Group (n=10) - rabbits treated with 200mg/kg/day of Moringa oleifera leaves extract orally; SF group (n=10) - rabbits treated with 0.9% saline orally. After five weeks, the animals were euthanized and the iliac arteries prepared for histology. Histological sections were analyzed by digital morphometry. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's t test. The significance level was 0.05. Results : there was no significant difference in myointimal hyperplasia between M200 and SF groups when comparing the iliac arteries submitted to angioplasty. Conclusion : there was no difference of myointimal hyperplasia between groups treated with saline and Moringa oleifera after angioplasty.

Objetivo: determinar a diferença da média de hiperplasia miointimal pós-angioplastia na artéria ilíaca de coelhos tratados e não tratados com extrato das folhas de Moringa oleifera. Métodos: ensaio aleatório em animais de laboratório por cinco semanas de seguimento, desenvolvido no Biotério do Laboratório de Tecnologia Farmacêutica da Universidade Federal da Paraíba. Foram utilizadas coelhas da raça Nova Zelândia, submetidas à dieta hipercolesterolêmica e angioplastia da artéria ilíaca externa, randomizadas em dois grupos: Grupo M200 (n=10), coelhas tratadas com 200mg/kg/dia de extrato de folhas de Moringa oleifera, por via oral; Grupo SF (n=10), coelhas tratadas com soro fisiológico 0,9%, por via oral. Após cinco semanas, os animais foram eutanaziados e as artérias ilíacas preparadas para histologia. Os cortes histológicos foram analisados por morfometria digital. A análise estatística foi realizada com o teste t de Student. O nível de significância foi 0,05. Resultados: comparando as artérias ilíacas submetidas à angioplastia do grupo M200 com as do grupo SF, não houve diferença significativa da hiperplasia miointimal Conclusão: não houve diferença da hiperplasia miointimal nos grupos tratados com soro fisiológico e Moringa oleifera após angioplastia.

Neuraxial anesthesia for orthopedic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Taking the outcome of mortality into consideration, there is controversy about the beneficial effects of neuraxial anesthesia for orthopedic surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia for orthopedic surgery. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review at Universidade Federal de Alagoas. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 10, 2012), PubMed (1966 to November 2012), Lilacs (1982 to November 2012), SciELO, EMBASE (1974 to November 2012) and reference lists of the studies included. Only randomized controlled trials were included. RESULTS: Out of 5,032 titles and abstracts, 17 studies were included. There were no statistically significant differences in mortality (risk difference, RD: -0.01; 95% confidence interval, CI: -0.04 to 0.01; n = 1903), stroke (RD: 0.02; 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.08; n = 259), myocardial infarction (RD: -0.01; 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.02; n = 291), length of hospitalization (mean difference, -0.05; 95% CI: -0.69 to 0.58; n = 870), postoperative cognitive dysfunction (RD: 0.00; 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.05; n = 479) or pneumonia (odds ratio, 0.61; 95% CI: 0.25 to 1.49; n = 167). CONCLUSION: So far, the evidence available from the studies included is insufficient to prove that neuraxial anesthesia is more effective and safer than general anesthesia for orthopedic surgery. However, this systematic review does not rule out clinically important differences with regard to mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, length of hospitalization, postoperative cognitive dysfunction or pneumonia.

Avaliação da ocorrência do refluxo venoso da safena magna pela ultrassonografia com doppler colorido após tratamento cirúrgico da insuficiência da junção safeno-femoral / Evaluation of the venous reflux of the great saphenous vein by duplex scan after surgical treatment of the saphenofemoral junction insufficiency

OBJETIVO: avaliar a ocorrência do refluxo da safena magna através da ultrassonografia com Doppler colorido em sujeitos submetidos ao tratamento da insuficiência da junção safeno-femoral por ligadura simples ou por ligadura com secção da crossa. MÉTODOS: foram realizadas 60 operações (45 sujeitos) de varizes com insuficiência da junção safeno-femoral (JSF), pertencentes à classificação clínica do CEAP 2 a 5, que foram distribuídos aleatoriamente em dois grupos. Um grupo denominado C, com ligadura e secção da crossa, e um grupo denominado L, com ligadura simples sem secção da crossa da veia safena magna. Foi então pesquisada a ocorrência do refluxo da safena magna nos grupos C e L através da ultrassonografia doppler colorida após o tratamento cirúrgico com intervalos de seis meses a um ano. RESULTADOS: dos 60 membros submetidos à abordagem da crossa da safena magna, 57 foram avaliados pela ultrassonografia doppler pós-operatório, pois dois sujeitos (três membros) não retornaram e foram excluídos do estudo. A média de idade foi 54 anos, 93% do sexo feminino e predominância da classificação (CEAP) C2 de 60,5%. Das 57 operações para o tratamento do refluxo da crossa da safena, 43,9% apresentaram refluxo no pós-operatório, sendo 14,1% do grupo C e 29,8% no grupo L (p<0,05). O risco relativo de apresentar refluxo da crossa da safena no grupo L foi 2,03 vezes maior em comparação com o grupo C. CONCLUSÃO: a secção da crossa da safena magna apresenta menos refluxo pós-operatório do que a ligadura simples no tratamento da insuficiência da crossa da veia safena magna.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the occurrence of reflux from the great saphenous vein by color Doppler ultrasonography in subjects undergoing treatment of insufficiency of the saphenofemoral junction by simple ligation or ligation with section of the saphenous arch. METHODS: We performed 60 operations (in 45 subjects) of varicose insufficiency of the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ), belonging to the CEAP clinical classification of 2-5, who were randomly divided into two groups. A group called C, with ligature and section of the saphenous arch, and a group called L, with simple ligation of the saphenous vein and no sectioning of its arch. We then investigated the occurrence of reflux from the great saphenous vein in groups C and L through postoperative color Doppler ultrasonography at intervals of six months to one year. RESULTS: Of the 60 members submitted to the approach of the saphenous arch, 57 were evaluated by postoperative doppler ultrasound, since two subjects (three limbs) did not return and were excluded from the study. The mean age was 54 years, with 93% females and predominance of CEAP classification 2 in 60.5%. Of the 57 operations for the treatment of reflux of the saphenous arch, 43.9% had reflux postoperatively,14.1% in group C and 29.8% in group L (p < 0,05). The relative risk of reflux of the saphenous arch in group L was 2.03 times higher compared with group C. CONCLUSION: the section of the arch of the great saphenous vein causes less postoperative reflux than simple ligation in treatment of insufficiency of the great saphenous vein.

Neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia for urological surgery: systematic review.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE Choosing the best anesthetic technique for urological surgery with the aim of mortality reduction remains controversial. The objective here was to compare the effectiveness and safety of neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia for urological surgery. DESIGN AND SETTING Systematic review, Universidade Federal de Alagoas. METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library (Issue 10, 2012), Medline via PubMed (1966 to October 2012), Lilacs (1982 to October 2012), SciELO and EMBASE (1974 to October 2012). The reference lists of the studies included and of one systematic review in the same field were also analyzed. The studies included were randomized controlled trials (RCT) that analyzed neuraxial anesthesia and general anesthesia for urological surgery. RESULTS The titles and abstracts of 2720 articles were analyzed. Among these, 16 studies were identified and 11 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. One RCT was published twice. The study validity was: Jadad score > 3 in one RCT; seven RCTs with unclear risk of bias as the most common response; and five RCTs not fulfilling half of the Delphi list items. The frequency of mortality was not significant between study groups in three RCTs. Meta-analysis was not performed. CONCLUSION At the moment, the evidence available cannot prove that neuraxial anesthesia is more effective and safer than general anesthesia for urological surgery. There were insufficient data to pool the results relating to mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, length of hospitalization, quality of life, degree of satisfaction, postoperative cognitive dysfunction and blood transfusion requirements.

Evaluation of the venous reflux of the great saphenous vein by duplex scan after surgical treatment of the saphenofemoral junction insufficiency.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the occurrence of reflux from the great saphenous vein by color Doppler ultrasonography in subjects undergoing treatment of insufficiency of the saphenofemoral junction by simple ligation or ligation with section of the saphenous arch. METHODS: We performed 60 operations (in 45 subjects) of varicose insufficiency of the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ), belonging to the CEAP clinical classification of 2-5, who were randomly divided into two groups. A group called C, with ligature and section of the saphenous arch, and a group called L, with simple ligation of the saphenous vein and no sectioning of its arch. We then investigated the occurrence of reflux from the great saphenous vein in groups C and L through postoperative color Doppler ultrasonography at intervals of six months to one year. RESULTS: Of the 60 members submitted to the approach of the saphenous arch, 57 were evaluated by postoperative doppler ultrasound, since two subjects (three limbs) did not return and were excluded from the study. The mean age was 54 years, with 93% females and predominance of CEAP classification 2 in 60.5%. Of the 57 operations for the treatment of reflux of the saphenous arch, 43.9% had reflux postoperatively,14.1% in group C and 29.8% in group L (p < 0,05). The relative risk of reflux of the saphenous arch in group L was 2.03 times higher compared with group C. CONCLUSION: the section of the arch of the great saphenous vein causes less postoperative reflux than simple ligation in treatment of insufficiency of the great saphenous vein.

Neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia for urological surgery: systematic review / Anestesia neuroaxial versus anestesia geral para cirurgias urológicas: revisão sistemática

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE Choosing the best anesthetic technique for urological surgery with the aim of mortality reduction remains controversial. The objective here was to compare the effectiveness and safety of neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia for urological surgery. DESIGN AND SETTING Systematic review, Universidade Federal de Alagoas. METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library (Issue 10, 2012), Medline via PubMed (1966 to October 2012), Lilacs (1982 to October 2012), SciELO and EMBASE (1974 to October 2012). The reference lists of the studies included and of one systematic review in the same field were also analyzed. The studies included were randomized controlled trials (RCT) that analyzed neuraxial anesthesia and general anesthesia for urological surgery. RESULTS The titles and abstracts of 2720 articles were analyzed. Among these, 16 studies were identified and 11 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. One RCT was published twice. The study validity was: Jadad score > 3 in one RCT; seven RCTs with unclear risk of bias as the most common response; and five RCTs not fulfilling half of the Delphi list items. The frequency of mortality was not significant between study groups in three RCTs. Meta-analysis was not performed. CONCLUSION At the moment, the evidence available cannot prove that neuraxial anesthesia is more effective and safer than general anesthesia for urological surgery. There were insufficient data to pool the results relating to mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, length of hospitalization, quality of life, degree of satisfaction, postoperative cognitive dysfunction and blood transfusion requirements. .

CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO A escolha da melhor técnica anestésica para cirurgias urológicas para reduzir mortalidade permanece controversa. O objetivo foi comparar a efetividade e segurança da anestesia neuroaxial versus anestesia geral para cirurgias urológicas. TIPO DE ESTUDO E LOCAL Revisão sistemática, Universidade Federal de Alagoas. MÉTODO Fizemos a busca em Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials na Cochrane Library (2012, volume 10), Medline via PubMed (1966 até outubro de 2012), Lilacs (1982 até outubro de 2012), SciELO e EMBASE (1974 até outubro de 2012). As listas de referências dos estudos incluídos e de uma revisão sistemática em urologia também foram analisadas. Os estudos incluídos foram ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECR) que analisaram as anestesias neuroaxial e geral para cirurgias urológicas. RESULTADOS Os títulos e resumos de 2.720 artigos foram analisados. Entre eles, 16 estudos foram identificados e 11 preencheram os critérios de inclusão. Um ECR foi publicado duas vezes. A validade dos estudos foi: escore de Jadad > 3 em um ECR; sete ECRs com indeterminado risco de viés como a resposta mais comum; cinco ECR sem preenchimento da metade dos itens da lista de Delphi. A frequência de mortalidade não foi significante entre os grupos de estudo em três ECR. A metanálise não foi realizada. CONCLUSÃO Até o momento, as evidências disponíveis não puderam provar que a anestesia neuroaxial seja mais efetiva e segura do que a anestesia geral para cirurgias urológicas. Não houve dados suficientes para reunir os resultados de mortalidade, infarto cerebral, infarto do miocárdio, duração de internação hospitalar, qualidade de vida, grau ...

Neuraxial anesthesia for orthopedic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials / Anestesia neuroaxial para cirurgia ortopedica: revisao sistematica e metanalise de ensaios clinicos randomizados

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Taking the outcome of mortality into consideration, there is controversy about the beneficial effects of neuraxial anesthesia for orthopedic surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia for orthopedic surgery. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review at Universidade Federal de Alagoas. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 10, 2012), PubMed (1966 to November 2012), Lilacs (1982 to November 2012), SciELO, EMBASE (1974 to November 2012) and reference lists of the studies included. Only randomized controlled trials were included. RESULTS: Out of 5,032 titles and abstracts, 17 studies were included. There were no statistically significant differences in mortality (risk difference, RD: -0.01; 95% confidence interval, CI: -0.04 to 0.01; n = 1903), stroke (RD: 0.02; 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.08; n = 259), myocardial infarction (RD: -0.01; 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.02; n = 291), length of hospitalization (mean difference, -0.05; 95% CI: -0.69 to 0.58; n = 870), postoperative cognitive dysfunction (RD: 0.00; 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.05; n = 479) or pneumonia (odds ratio, 0.61; 95% CI: 0.25 to 1.49; n = 167). CONCLUSION: So far, the evidence available from the studies included is insufficient to prove that neuraxial anesthesia is more effective and safer than general anesthesia for orthopedic surgery. However, this systematic review does not rule out clinically important differences with regard to mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, length of hospitalization, postoperative cognitive dysfunction or pneumonia. .

CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: Considerando o desfecho de mortalidade, existe controvérsia acerca dos efeitos benéficos da anestesia neuroaxial (AN) para cirurgias ortopédicas. O objetivo do estudo foi comparar efetividade e segurança da AN versus anestesia geral (AG) para cirurgias ortopédicas. TIPO DE ESTUDO E LOCAL: Revisão sistemática na Universidade Federal de Alagoas. MÉTODOS: Buscamos em Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2012, volume 10), PubMed (1966 até novembro de 2012), Lilacs (1982 até novembro de 2012), SciELO, EMBASE (1974 até novembro de 2012) e listas de referências dos estudos incluídos. Apenas ensaios clínicos randomizados foram incluídos. RESULTADOS: Dentre 5.032 títulos e resumos, 17 estudos foram incluídos. Não houve diferença estatística em mortalidade (diferença de risco, DR: -0,01; intervalo de confiança de 95%, IC: -0,04 a 0.01; n = 1903), em acidente vascular encefálico (DR: 0,02; IC 95%: -0,04 a 0,08; n = 259, em infarto miocárdico (DR: -0.01; IC 95%: -0,04 a 0.02; n = 291), tempo de hospitalização (diferença média, -0,05; IC 95%: -0,69 a 0,58; n = 870), em disfunção cognitiva pós-operatória (DR: 0,00; IC 95%: -0,04 a 0,05; n = 479) e pneumonia (razão de chances, 0,61; IC 95%: 0,25 a 1,49; n = 167). CONCLUSÃO: Até o momento, as evidências são insuficientes nos estudos incluídos para provar que AN é mais efetiva e segura do que AG para cirurgias ortopédicas. Esta revisão sistemática não descartou diferenças clínicas importantes para mortalidade, acidente vascular encefálico, infarto miocárdico, tempo de internação, disfunção cognitiva pós-operatória e pneumonia. .

Anestesia neuroaxial comparada à anestesia geral para procedimentos na metade inferior do corpo: revisão sistemática de revisões sistemáticas / Neuraxial anesthesia compared to general anesthesia for procedures on the lower half of the body: systematic review of systematic reviews / Anestesia neuroaxial comparada con la anestesia general para procedimientos en la mitad inferior del cuerpo: revisión sistemática de revisiones sistemáticas

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: As revisões sistemáticas organizam dados da literatura, combinando os resultados dos estudos publicados com o objetivo de resolver conflitos na área do conhecimento médico descrevendo as intervenções. O relato inadequado das revisões sistemáticas pode prejudicar sua credibilidade e interferir na qualidade de seus resultados. O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar a frequência de revisões sistemáticas de boa qualidade que comparam a anestesia neuroaxial com a anestesia geral para procedimentos na metade inferior do corpo. MÉTODO: Revisão sistemática de revisões sistemáticas, com variável primária sendo a frequência de revisões sistemáticas de boa qualidade. As informações foram analisadas a partir dos seguintes bancos de dados: LILACS (janeiro de 1982 a dezembro de 2010), PubMed (janeiro de 1950 a dezembro de 2010), Cochrane Database of Systematic Review e Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (volume 10, 2010), e SciELO (em dezembro de 2010). A qualidade das revisões sistemáticas foi determinada pelo Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire. O cálculo do tamanho da amostra demonstrou ser necessária a análise de 8 revisões sistemáticas, considerando que a frequência de revisões sistemáticas de boa qualidade foi de 5 por cento, a precisão absoluta de 15 por cento e o nível de significância de 5 por cento. RESULTADOS: Foram identificados 1.995 artigos. O processo de seleção eliminou 1.968 artigos. Foram lidos 27 artigos de revisões sistemáticas na íntegra, foram excluídos 9 devido à incompatibilidade com os critérios de inclusão, e 8 eram publicações duplicadas. Dez revisões sistemáticas foram analisadas quanto a sua qualidade. A frequência de revisões sistemáticas de boa qualidade foi de 40 por cento (4/10; IC 95 por cento 9,6 a 70,4 por cento). CONCLUSÃO: A frequência de revisões sistemáticas de boa qualidade foi de 40 por cento.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Systematic reviews organize literature data by combining results from published studies in order to resolve conflicts in the area of medical knowledge describing the interventions. The inadequate reporting of systematic reviews can damage the credibility and interfere in the results' quality. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of good quality systematic reviews comparing neuraxial anesthesia with general anesthesia for procedures on the lower half of the body. METHODS: Systematic review of systematic reviews. Primary variable: The frequency of good quality systematic reviews. The information was analyzed from the following databases: LILACS (January 1982 to December 2010); PubMed (January 1950 to December 2010); The Cochrane Database of Systematic Review and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (volume 10, 2010); and SciELO (December 2010). The quality of systematic reviews was determined by the Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire. The sample size calculation showed that it was necessary to analyze eight systematic reviews, taking into account that the frequency of good quality systematic reviews was 5 percent, an absolute precision of 15 percent, and a significance level of 5 percent. RESULTS: Were identified 1,995 articles. The selection process eliminated 1,968 articles. Twenty-seven articles of systematic reviews were read in full, 9 were excluded due to incompatibility with the inclusion criteria, and 8 were duplicate publications. Ten systematic reviews were assessed for their quality. The frequency of good quality systematic reviews was 40 percent (4/10; 95 percent CI 9.6 to 70.4 percent). CONCLUSION: The frequency of good quality systematic reviews was 40 percent.

JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS: Las revisiones sistemáticas organizan datos de la literatura, combinando los resultados de los estudios publicados con el objetivo de resolver los conflictos en el área del conocimiento médico describiendo las intervenciones. El relato inadecuado de las revisiones sistemáticas, puede perjudicar su credibilidad e interferir en la calidad de sus resultados. El objetivo de este estudio, fue determinar la frecuencia de las revisiones sistemáticas de buena calidad que comparan la anestesia neuroaxial con la anestesia general para procedimientos en la mitad inferior del cuerpo. MÉTODO: Revisión sistemática de revisiones sistemáticas, con una variable primaria siendo la frecuencia de revisiones sistemáticas de buena calidad. Las informaciones fueron analizadas a partir de las siguientes bases de datos: LILACS (enero de 1982 a diciembre de 2010), PubMed (enero de 1950 a diciembre de 2010), The Cochrane Database of Systematic Review y Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (volumen 10, 2010) y SciELO (en diciembre de 2010). La calidad de las revisiones sistemáticas quedó determinada por el Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire. El cálculo del tamaño de la muestra arrojó que era necesario el análisis de 8 revisiones sistemáticas, considerando la frecuencia de revisiones sistemáticas de buena calidad que fue de un 5 por ciento, la exactitud absoluta de un 15 por ciento y el nivel de significancia de un 5 por ciento. RESULTADOS: Fue identificado 1.995 artículos. El proceso de selección eliminó 1.968 artículos. Se leyeron 27 artículos de revisiones sistemáticas integralmente, fueron excluidos 9 debido a la incompatibilidad con los criterios de inclusión, y 8 que eran publicaciones duplicadas. Diez revisiones sistemáticas fueron analizadas en cuanto a su calidad. La frecuencia de las revisiones sistemáticas de buena calidad fue de un 40 por ciento (4/10; IC 95 por ciento 9,6 a 70,4 por ciento). CONCLUSIONES: La frecuencia de revisiones sistemáticas de buena calidad fue del 40 por ciento.

Neuraxial anesthesia compared to general anesthesia for procedures on the lower half of the body: systematic review of systematic reviews.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Systematic reviews organize literature data by combining results from published studies in order to resolve conflicts in the area of medical knowledge describing the interventions. The inadequate reporting of systematic reviews can damage the credibility and interfere in the results' quality. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of good quality systematic reviews comparing neuraxial anesthesia with general anesthesia for procedures on the lower half of the body. METHODS: Systematic review of systematic reviews. Primary variable: The frequency of good quality systematic reviews. The information was analyzed from the following databases: LILACS (January 1982 to December 2010); PubMed (January 1950 to December 2010); The Cochrane Database of Systematic Review and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (volume 10, 2010); and SciELO (December 2010). The quality of systematic reviews was determined by the Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire. The sample size calculation showed that it was necessary to analyze eight systematic reviews, taking into account that the frequency of good quality systematic reviews was 5%, an absolute precision of 15%, and a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Were identified 1,995 articles. The selection process eliminated 1,968 articles. Twenty-seven articles of systematic reviews were read in full, 9 were excluded due to incompatibility with the inclusion criteria, and 8 were duplicate publications. Ten systematic reviews were assessed for their quality. The frequency of good quality systematic reviews was 40% (4/10; 95% CI 9.6 to 70.4%). CONCLUSION: The frequency of good quality systematic reviews was 40%.

Estudo anatômico da veia braquial comum como via de drenagem colateral do membro superior / Anatomic study of the common brachial vein as a collateral drainage channel of the upper limb

CONTEXTO: Traumatismos ou tromboses que possam evoluir com alterações da drenagem venosa do membro superior, dependendo do território interrompido, podem ter como mecanismo compensatório uma via colateral de drenagem sem que haja prejuízo para o retorno venoso desse membro. A veia braquial comum apresenta-se como uma alternativa plausível e pouco conhecida. OBJETIVO: Descrever a anatomia da veia braquial comum como via de drenagem colateral no membro superior. MÉTODOS: Utilizamos 30 cadáveres do sexo masculino, cujos membros superiores estavam articulados ao tronco, não importando a raça, formolizados e mantidos em conservação com solução de formol a 10 por cento. Utilizamos como critérios de exclusão cadáveres com um dos membros desarticulado ou alterações deformantes em topografia das estruturas estudadas. RESULTADOS: A veia braquial comum esteve presente em 73 por cento (22/30) dos cadáveres estudados, sendo que em 18 por cento (04/22) dos casos drenou para a veia basílica no seguimento proximal do braço e em 82 por cento (18/22), para a veia axilar. CONCLUSÃO: A veia braquial comum está frequentemente presente e, na maior parte das vezes, desemboca na veia axilar.

BACKGROUND: Trauma and thrombosis that can result in changes in the venous drainage of the upper limb, depending on the vascular territory interrupted, may have as a compensatory mechanism a collateral drainage channel that prevents damage to the venous return of that limb. The common brachial vein is a plausible and little known collateral channel for this purpose. OBJECTIVE: To describe the anatomy of the common brachial vein as a collateral drainage channel of the upper limb. METHODS: We have dissected 30 cadavers of people of different races, whose upper limbs were articulated to the trunk and preserved in a 10 percent formaldehyde solution. The exclusion criteria were disarticulated limbs or deformities in the topography of the studied structures. RESULTS: The common brachial vein was present in 73 percent (22/30) of the cadavers dissected. The common brachial vein drained into the axillary vein in 82 percent (18/22) and into the basilic vein in the proximal segment of the upper limb in 18 percent of the cadavers (04/22). CONCLUSION: The common brachial vein is frequently present, and, in most cases, it drains into the axillary vein.

Atenção integral ao portador de pé diabético / Comprehensive care to patients with diabetic foot

São apresentadas, nessa separata, as principais orientações sobre a atenção às complicações do pé diabético. A neuropatia, com suas diversas apresentações que acometem os membros inferiores dos diabéticos, as lesões da doença arterial obstrutiva periférica (DAOP), as múltiplas apresentações da infecção do pé diabético, e, principalmente, os cuidados preventivos que possam impedir o estabelecimento ou a evolução dessas complicações são tratados de forma sistemática e simplificada, visando a atenção integral desses doentes. Especial cuidado é dado às orientações diferenciadas para os diversos níveis de atenção nos serviços públicos de saúde, porta de entrada virtual de 80% dos infelizes portadores dessa complicação. São aqui apresentados modelos de atenção e sugeridos protocolos que podem contribuir para a efetiva redução do número de amputações, internações e óbitos de diabéticos com complicações nos membros inferiores.

Optimal search strategy for clinical trials in the Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Literature Database (LILACS) [Comments]

Article published on Sao Paulo Medical Journal 115(3) 1997 about searching for clinical trials in LILACS.

Searching the Literatura Latino Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS) database improves systematic reviews

The article presents an evaluation about the possibility of LILACS - Literatura Latino Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde database be used as a routine source to identify studies for systematic reviews.